Randy Blue gay sex That 70s Gay Porn Movie Leo Giamani Christian Sharp Xander Scott Mike West

RANDYBLUE.COM just releases Part 1 of That 70’s Gay Porn Movie! Looks like there are 2 sex scenes in this video. Leo Giamani as the hunky Professor who feeds an eager Mike West a mouthfull of huge cock, as well as rams his ass with a dildo. With Xander Scott and Christian Sharp fuck scene by the pool.

Randy Blue gay sex That 70s Gay Porn Movie Leo Giamani Christian Sharp Xander Scott Mike West

Randy Blue gay sex That 70s Gay Porn Movie Leo Giamani Christian Sharp Xander Scott Mike West

Randy Blue gay sex That 70s Gay Porn Movie Leo Giamani Christian Sharp Xander Scott Mike West

Randy Blue gay sex That 70s Gay Porn Movie Leo Giamani Christian Sharp Xander Scott Mike West

+ That 70’s Gay Porn Movie Part 1 Photo Gallery

+ Behind The Scenes | Meet The Cast

+ RANDYBLUE.COM

This post has 37 comments.

  1. Gigolo
    30 Jul 09
    5:01 pm

    Exactly the reason I CAN’T STAND randy blue. ALways fake, overdone, over photoshopped everything. The guys can be so much hotter when portrayed in a natural state.

  2. Adam
    30 Jul 09
    5:10 pm

    I totally couldn’t agree more on that Gigolo. I like some stuff from Randy Blue but this just looks plain stupid.

  3. peet
    30 Jul 09
    6:30 pm

    Xander is the hottest guy in this scene (again).

  4. Bryan
    30 Jul 09
    8:23 pm

    It would have helped if they actually watched some gay porn from the 70’s before they put this mess together. It doesn’t look good. It doesn’t look clever. It doesn’t look hot.

    WTF is that initiation thing about? That’s 70’s???

  5. Gigolo
    30 Jul 09
    9:55 pm

    Thanks Adam. And you’re right Bryan. You know it would have at least helped if the proper research was done for 70’s porn. I remember big dicked, hairy crotched action. not this stuff.

  6. Jigae
    30 Jul 09
    11:54 pm

    It’s not meant to LITERALLY be a 70s gay porn. It’s a tongue-in-cheek 70s-themed porn.

    Chill out people. I think it looks hot.

  7. Jigae
    30 Jul 09
    11:55 pm

    Also, if you want to watch a 70s porn, just watch one. They have hot men, guilt-free barebacking… this isn’t in competition with them. They’re entirely different things.

  8. mark
    31 Jul 09
    1:45 am

    I thought Leo was going to retire before he became “overexposed”… I think we’ve passed that point months ago.

    Gimmicky porn is just plain stupid. Amateur is better, why don’t people just go to xtube and look up some regular people without the pretense or fakeness. You don’t have to pay ridiculous amount of money for its lack of quality unlike its pro counterparts.

    You can’t fake that raw energy you see amateur couples have versus some tweaked muscle head thinking about paying his bills.

  9. mark
    31 Jul 09
    2:04 am

    “tongue-in-cheek 70s-themed porn”…”entirely different things”

    Porn is porn, no matter how you spin it. If you as a viewer, in 2009, watch 70’s porn you might find to be outdated and not very hot.

    So Again, why make a 70’s-themed porn to an majority audience that watches porn set in 2009?
    Probably because your product is weak and isn’t selling and you need to create a gimmick to stand out. Which is what the majority of the industry does, repetition but with some kind of a twist. You can only use the same models so many times, and have the same sex scenes play out before you have to come up with a “theme”.

    It’s all been done before, so lets make a lame 70’s theme porn. Lets put leo in a pornstache and bellbottoms and well make it a hit!

  10. mark
    31 Jul 09
    2:06 am

    BOO!! BOOO! HISSS!

    Where are the rotten vegetables?

    Hey wait I have another theme!

    Why don’t we take rotten vegetables and start pegging Leo with it!?!

  11. tom in portland
    31 Jul 09
    2:22 am

    As just plain porn the first part of this video completely disappoints.
    First, although it is 54 minutes long, only one guy, Christian Sharp, actually gets fucked.
    Leo sticks a dildo in Mike West’s butt, but we are still waiting to see Mike West get fucked in front of a camera. Why cast Leo and his big cock and then have him use a (small!) dildo on Mike West. Just stupid directing.
    We do get to see Christian Sharp get fucked on camera for the first time. RB has made folks wait a long time for this. Ordinarily, you would expect such a scene to focus on Christian’s very fine ass, with some rimming or assplay, and plenty of nice shots of penetration and insertion. But this is RB and incompetence by the director and cameraman is the rule here. Most of the fucking is filmed from the side and when we do get an actual closeup, it is poorly lit, out of focus, or filmed from an odd angle that hides more than it shows. Its likely that much of the “fucking” is simulated as is true of so many RB scenes. Christian appears to be completely flacid for most of the fucking and does not cum while being fucked. Overall a very poor way to showcase Christian in his debut as a bottom. Christian is a very hot model, but he needs to get away from RB and film some scenes with a company that has some idea how to showcase such a hot guy.

  12. asdfasdf
    31 Jul 09
    10:22 am

    “Its likely that much of the “fucking” is simulated as is true of so many RB scenes.”

    Very true point. Is why I cannot stand Leo, for the reason you’ve given the scenes are simulated with him. Or any other actor, you know just despises gay sex, but wants the cash that comes by “performing” in gay porn.

    When they aren’t Leo takes special K to perform in the scene. Ask, Erik Rhodes.

    I don’t know him, but I get the sense this guy is a douchebag.

  13. Josh
    31 Jul 09
    11:54 am

    This does look bad but I think that one of the problems of the internet is the overproliferation of porno. And it also somehow reveals how despearte most porn actors are, a fact which many viewers seem to ignore. I speak from first hand experience as someone who has escorted and done porno and it was ALWAYS done out of necessity, often of desperation. That’s why so many of the guys use steroids and other drugs to anaesthetize the pain a bit. Look at son=me of the porno actors on this site; yeah, the sex may be hot but it is also hot because they do things you wouldn’t lower yourself to do. And these guys think no one knows what they are doing? I have lost many jobs and relationships because of having done porn.

    I was recently in Hungary and the guys I saw had been in porno for years and went to clubs waiting for a client, any client, any amount of money. It doesn’t pay very well and the health risks are enormous, not just from HIV. Look at someone like Fernando Nielsen. The guy does anything just to get fucked in porno or sell his ass, and he has for years! In reality would you even want to be with someone like him? Someone whose sole claim to fame is that ANYONE can fuck him? Obviously these guys have no alternative. Read Erik Rhodes’ blog to see what life as a porno actor is really like.

  14. mike
    31 Jul 09
    1:58 pm

    Hell I did Colt in the 70’s and early 80’s and porn never looked this HIGH SCHOOL PRODUCTION!

    Here is a hint…SKIP THE Ginmicks and shoot Hotter more Masculine Men…of ANY AGE…but for God’s sake skip the Hollywood thing…you don’t do it well!

  15. Steve
    31 Jul 09
    2:05 pm

    Yeah Mike, but COLT in the 70s and 80s was freakin’ hot! I agree with you and what Josh wrote above you completely: get hotter and more masculine men and use some good production values. Gay porn does not need gimmicks, as you said so well.

  16. Adam
    31 Jul 09
    2:07 pm

    I still watch Catalina and COLT videos from the early ’80s; movies like SAILOR IN THE WILD with that stellar bottom stud Bill Henson, and nothing today compares. The guys were hot and real in those 80s movies, and the sex was amazing. This is all such crap.

  17. mark
    31 Jul 09
    2:48 pm

    Josh, you said you were in porn, who r u if you don’t mind me asking?

  18. mark
    31 Jul 09
    2:54 pm

    the performers who develop a following, are the ones that enjoy the sex the most and have chemistry with partners of their choosing.

    Most of these guys don’t give a shit, perform with actors they don’t find attractive, and just want to get paid at the end of the day. They do acts on screen they aren’t really turned on by, but rather because they make more money doing them. So again, the quality of the performance suffers.

    I was watching a behind the scenes video of Randy Blue with Leo and some other actor… basically the Director was telling them what to do, and there wasn’t really any contact. They were just going through the motions to get the shots they need.

    Randy Blue was dumb for putting out the video, especially because your overheard the Director call out Leo’s real name of Rob. So stupid.

  19. JuneBug
    31 Jul 09
    3:28 pm

    I don’t think Randy Blue was going for COLT or replicating 70’s porn. They don’t have the guys for the so of course that was not their intent- in fact just read the bio it’s pretty simple. Just a porn people…. Stop getting stuck on the fact that it says 70’s.

  20. Fred Scott
    31 Jul 09
    3:33 pm

    It’s called PARODY people.

  21. Gigolo
    31 Jul 09
    4:49 pm

    I think if you’re going to do a paradoy of porn and almost be too literal about it, and effort to ACTUALLY MAKE THE SEX HOT would have been nice. I’m not expecting the recreation of 70’s porn, but as much as this was “teased” and promoted, Randy should have at least made a quality production.

  22. charlie_jackpot
    31 Jul 09
    5:32 pm

    in reference to the clip of Leo behind the scenes with Blake Riley and you heard the director call Leo Rob

    I think that is a pretty hot scene and you can clearly see that Blake is up for it and hard just from Leo lying on top of him (unless it was Viagra, but then Blake Riley looks like a slut so I doubt it)

    And that scene was one where Leo looked the hardest I’ve seen him – i really like that scene

  23. studyholic
    31 Jul 09
    6:41 pm

    In honor of this crappy fake gay 70s stupid porn movie, here are four things that get me steamed about gay porn:
    *
    (1) *Horrible* gay porn websites that charge excessive monthly rates and present poorly directed porn full of models who are tentative about getting blown, fucked or fucking. Randy Blue and Jake Cruise (with his incredibly nasty, pervy, bare-backing self) are two examples. Like Tom of Portland said, the directing of Randy Blue’s latest 70s gay porn was horrible. I can;t believe I watch the sample. He forgot to arouse us! For God’s sake, give me something I can jerk off to continuously! When the gimmicks, “parodying,” and bullshit gets in the way of hot, fully lit scenes then all is lost for me.
    *
    (2) Gay-for-pay porn stars are HORRIBLE. God, they are terrible! Even Jeff Stryker looked like a terrible, uppity douchebag that never got fucked and never, to my mind, sucked. He was the worse kind of macho stereotype: the unavailable straight guy who you can pay to do just a little bit with you. Leo G. and other douchey gay-for-pay porn “stars” are like cancers on gay porn. I don’t care how “hot” they look. Most of the time, like Josh said in this thread, they just look DESPERATE and UNINTERESTED. I’d rather see 15 sissy boys cutting loose ravenously than a trailer of these macho gay-for-pays who don’t even like gay sex!
    *
    (3) The world is not mostly white and America isn’t even mostly white. Why can’t gay porn be interracial like the worlds that we live in? I swear if I see another all-white porn cast without any Latins, Asians, blacks, I’m gonna scream. A lot of porn buyers and fans (like QMN) are Asian like me or black or persons of color. We buy just as many products. These porn makers lose money when they fail to diversify. Are Asians, blacks, and Latins so horrible that they white boys don’t wish to touch them?!
    *
    (4) So called “agents” like Fred Scott are exploiters. Even if they aren’t trying to have sex with the model, they are taking money from the model’s very meager fees for gay porn sex. There is no need for middle-men who then take money from you! No agent has negotiated a fee that sustains a porn star for the rest of their lives! Matthew Rush was ball-n-chained to Falcon! An online acquaintance of mine calls these “agents” *whore-keepers*. So sorry Fred Scot: until you stop taking money from these porn stars and calling it “representation” your opinion doesn’t count. You are a shark, not a fan–an exploiter like all the rest. Who cares if you think Randy Blue’s stupid 70s porno is a parody or not!

  24. mark
    31 Jul 09
    8:31 pm

    Ha ha ha, awesome post, studyholic. Couldn’t have said it better myself!

  25. Scott
    31 Jul 09
    10:23 pm

    I’d rather watch the real 70s stuff with guys like Al Parker, Jack Wrangler and Eric Ryan. Those fuckers knew how to, uh, fuck. Even Matt Ramsey (aka Peter North) in early 80s stuff, who I guess was gay-for-pay before the term was so prolific. At least he got into it. Every thing I’ve seen Leo in, he looks like a lost dog in high weeds. In The Trainer, Adam Kilian kept having to motion for him to kiss. Chris Rockway reminds me a bit of Jon Vincent, but is so over the top with his “Look, Ma, I’m acting” chatter and mannerisms. And Pat Bateman, even when he’s getting fucked up the ass and eating cum is intent on conveying to everyone: “I’m REALLY straight!”

    I’m just waiting for all the chuckleheads to come along and rag on “the haters.” A preemptory word: If you’re so thin-skinned that you can’t take criticism, you’re in the wrong biz.

  26. anon
    31 Jul 09
    11:07 pm

    finally someone thinks the way I do. I got heat months ago for the posts I made, which is exactly what Studyholic and Scott are saying now.

    I’m not some stereotype, of a queer pining after some unobtainable “straight” Adonis. I don’t appreciate the porn that is geared to me, a gay man’s genre, to reinforce the bullshit neurosis that the straight majority projects on gays.

  27. blech!
    01 Aug 09
    12:54 am

    This is absolute SHITE! Its not funny and its not even good porn, what the fuck are you all blabbing about, get over it, its just a loud of CRAP!!!!

  28. Jigae
    01 Aug 09
    1:13 am

    Don’t get me wrong. I hate the “gay for pay” crap as much as the next guy. Having said that, some of the Randy Blue stuff really is hot — I try to ignore their alleged heterosexuality and just focus on the sex.

  29. tom
    01 Aug 09
    2:42 am

    So do you work for Randy Blue then ‘Jigae’ sounds like your promoting them?

  30. anon
    01 Aug 09
    3:15 am

    So you are you saying you won’t find sex between two consenting gays isn’t hot versus a consenting straight guy who in it for the buck rather then the fuck?

    It seems that you would find the latter hot just as much, and if this is the case, what does it matter if as a collective group of consumers we say these gimmicks aren’t working anymore, so come up with something better? Drop the pretense and make good product.

  31. Rob
    01 Aug 09
    11:39 am

    Wow! Excellent comments guys. Finally some gay men who are saying (or writing) passionately about how so many of us feel about the so-called “gay-for-pay” bullshit that amazingly is still with us in 2009! The producers of these usually shitty pornos must really be hoping to feedinto any residual self-hatred among the gay community.
    As a competitive bodybuilder and an escort who is a total bottom I hate they way they “sell” straight guys in these pornos. I guess they figure the fag can get fucked up the ass but the straight guy, if his cock is big enough, can do the fucking as long as he proclaims his straightness and looks disinterested while he’s fucking. I’ve had plenty of experience and I can assure you that gay men ALWAYS fuck better, are ALWAYS as macho as the straight guys, and if they are bodybuilders, the gay guys are the ones with the better bodies and most of us are absoultely fine with being gay. I cannot count the amount of times at the gym or as a client supposedly straight guys have come to me and are fascinated that I am masculine, opnely gay and a bodybuilder and then tell me how they are going to screw my brains out and then they never deliver. They’re so straight yet the hang around lockerrooms or bodybuilding shows and have apparently seen every fucking gay porn made in the last ten years, and yet they are straight since it’s you sucking the dick or taking it up the ass. We all know full well they are simply closet cases-and usually bottoms at that-but I assure them that I am as gay as the next guy even if I can kick their ass or play any sport better than they can. Go out and ask any straigth woman how she feels about her boyfriend having sex with guys and not one I’ve ever met would say she was thrilled. Most would say: come on, he’s got to be gay and that’s cool just don’t date me. Give me a hot, well-adjusted gay man as a top any day over these guys. The gay guys are hotter and better built and fuck better anyway, trust me.

  32. mike
    01 Aug 09
    12:30 pm

    Ya…well I think 9 out of 10 men feel the same
    Problem is the studios don’t listen and don’t care. They rather churn out crap they like then sit back at the Grabby’s and bitch about the Market.
    Perfect example Chi Chi in her lates “Dirty Movie”

    Adam Killian is beautiful but in Leather NOT!
    He has as much make up on in that movie as Chi Chi does when she spins!….WAKE UP

    She took IMO the hottest man in LA Mitch Rock and made him into a GLAM ROCK TWINK THANG….LORD HAVE MERCY.

    You want to sell movies. Try asking the buyers who and What they want to see. I remember once they did a story in Honcho years ago asking viewers choices…and whamo…it was a great cast. I think it was called The BIgger the Better… HUGE HIT!

    HINT

  33. Erik
    01 Aug 09
    1:43 pm

    Is it my imagination or are most porn actors overexposed today? It used to be that you would want to see some guy from Catalina in another film but POOF! he was out of the business and had disappeared from the face of the earth, like that great bottom Bill Henson someone on here mentioned. But today, even in eastern European porn guys like Roberto Giorgio, who I think is great, seem to do an endless stream of porn over a decade. I like Francois Sagat but seriously, how many times can you see him get fucked with that spaced out look on his face. Even a favorite on here like Vince Ferelli, okay, I have three videos of him getting nailed and he is hot and built, but the videos are all the same and the sex is frankly bad, downright boring. Why would I buy another video of him? It almost seems that the guys making the porno don’t like gay sex at all. The only hot ones I’ve seen lately are by Raging Stallion.

  34. Joe
    02 Aug 09
    1:14 pm

    So much of this crap is so mechanical. What about simply hiring real, hot, handsome, masculine guys who love to fuck other guys, keep the story simple and film that! I agree wholeheartedly with what Wrik wrote above: most of the sex in these films is so goddam boring. And producers, word to the wise, drop the fucking bullshit about these guys being straight. Does anyone actually buy that crap? Ask any woman if she wants to see her boyfriend get nailed or sucked in gay porno. Even the bottoms are sold as actually being straight guys, from Bill Henson (who the director said “loved being fucked and could never stay hard.” (sounds gay to me), to Kyle McKenna (total bottom) to most guys in EuroCrapPorno to the guys on Randy Blue or SeanCody. How self hating to think that gay guys would prefer to get off on straight men rather than gay men. Maybe it’s just an excuse for really dull, bad porno. I want someone to ask Vince Ferelli or Leo Giamati’s girlfriends what they think of seeing them get fucked.

  35. Tom
    02 Aug 09
    1:22 pm

    Hey wait a minute! Maybe I’m straight, too: I’m a big muscle dude who loves to suck cock and get fucked in the ass but apparently that doesn’t mean I’m gay at all. This has opened up a whole new world of possibilites to me. I must admit I’m pretty turned off by pussy but hey, maybe I just haven’t met the right one.

  36. studyholic
    04 Aug 09
    5:46 pm

    Tom: LOL…heehee…

  37. Carter
    09 Aug 09
    11:06 pm

    It seems strange to me that people are griping about how boring this video must be, and yet spending so much time dissecting it in excruciating detail. Just about every single porn made is to some degree cheesy, silly and contrived. While some directors have used hardcore sex within the context of a serious movie, those films are not porn films. Porn films are not intended to be serious movies; rather, they are basically masturbatory aids. There’s nothing wrong with that. They are what they are. If this particular film and other other flicks from Randy Blue don’t float your boat, then just DON’T watch them. Move on and watch whatever turns you on. And for the people suggesting that the actors are in porn “just for the money,” get freaking real. The very highest paid porn actors make at most $3,000, and very rarely $5,000, a film–and they don’t make that every film. Generally, you would have to star in at least 50 films a a year to make a decent living; otherwise, you would just be getting by making porn. If you want to make money, there are many other professions that pay far better. And even if you just want to make “quick” money for a living, you would be better off selling drugs or being a prostitute full-time (and I know some porn stars are prostitutes). Aside from the few individuals who make one or two movies because they need a fast buck, most individuals go into porn, not for the money, but for the excitement. They are exhibitionists and they enjoy being able to put their sexual activity on display.